The RembrandtOpen Impression Project

Census record · museum

The Morgan Library & Museum

Self Portrait in a Velvet Cap with Plume · RvR 24
Strongly supported3Institutional recordInstitution’s own record →
Holder
The Morgan Library & Museum
Place
New York, United States
Accession
RvR 24
Title as catalogued
Self Portrait in a Velvet Cap with Plume
Date as catalogued
1638
Medium as catalogued
Etching on paper
State
II · New Hollstein
State, verbatim
NHD 170, II (the record's Notes field also says 'Only one state.')
Catalogue references
NHD 170, II
Plate
134 x 103
Sheet
Watermark
Countermark: Letters 'RP' with trefoil
Collector marks
Provenance
George W. Vanderbilt (1862-1914); from whom purchased by J. Pierpont Morgan in 1905.
Credit line
Condition
Rights
Not stated
Checked
2026-08-12 — Project — record read directly from the holding institution's own published record

Transcription notes

Internal contradiction in the Morgan record: the 'NHD number' field reads 'NHD 170, II' while the 'Notes' field reads 'Only one state.' Recorded verbatim, not reconciled. Inscription: 'Signed and dated upper left, "Rembrandt f 1638".' Dimension '134 x 103 mm' unlabelled. Cross-check: One of only two impressions in this census with a recorded watermark, and the only one with a countermark description ('RP' with trefoil) - watermark evidence is the primary tool for dating Rembrandt impressions, so this is high-value. The record's internal tension between 'NHD 170, II' and 'Only one state.' mirrors the Bartsch/White-Boon vs New Hollstein divergence seen across the census. Part of the Morgan's 'Rembrandt Prints Online' project. API route: None. themorgan.org serves a Cloudflare bot-verification interstitial to curl and WebFetch; retrieved by rendering the page in a browser after the challenge cleared.

How to read this record

Every field above is transcribed from the holding institution’s own published record, in the institution’s own words. Nothing has been normalised, converted or reconciled — where a record is internally inconsistent, or disagrees with another institution, the inconsistency is preserved, because it is data about the state of cataloguing for this plate rather than noise to be tidied away.

If this record is wrong — and if you work at this institution you will know before we do — please tell us. Corrections are logged with their reason and credited.