The RembrandtOpen Impression Project

Canonical record · NP-RMB-001

Self-Portrait in a Velvet Cap with Plume

One impression of Rembrandt's 1638 etched self-portrait, held in a private collection and published here as an open research record. The object entered the collection in 2023 through a New York auction. Almost everything below is a working record drawn from acquisition documentation and has not yet been examined by a conservator or a specialist in Old Master prints. This page states what is known, what is only recorded, and what is unknown, and marks each with its evidence.

Plate worked

1638

Well established for this composition

This sheet printed

Unknown

Could be any point across the next two and a half centuries

Ownership before 2023

Unknown

1638 – 2023

134 mm103 mmNo image publishednot yet photographed
Plate dimensions as recorded by the Rijksmuseum for its impression of this composition. This sheet has not been measured under a conservation protocol.

Identification

Identification

Artist

Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn (1606–1669)

Probable

The attribution here is the auction house's. The project does not itself attribute, and it does not treat an auction attribution as settled. What is being claimed at 'probable' is that the sheet is an impression from Rembrandt's plate; the question of when it was printed is separate and open.

  • 5Auction catalogueAuction catalogue entry for the lot as offered, Bonhams New York, 2023 · Bonhams · 2023on request
  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisAn examination by a specialist in Old Master prints concluding that the sheet is a later restrike from Rembrandt's plate, a reproduction after the composition, or a copy by another hand. Any of these would keep the composition and change the object.

CL-ARTISTStated by Bonhams, as cataloguerAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Title

Self-Portrait in a Velvet Cap with Plume

Probable

Titles of Rembrandt's etchings are conventions applied by cataloguers, not by Rembrandt. Different catalogues and print rooms use different ones for the same plate. The census records each institution's own title verbatim rather than imposing one.

  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisAlignment with the title used in the New Hollstein catalogue and by the major print rooms, which may differ.

CL-TITLEAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Date of the plate

1638

Probable

This is the date Rembrandt worked the plate. It is NOT the date this sheet was printed. The two can be separated by decades or centuries, and separating them is the central open question about this object.

  • 5Auction catalogueAuction catalogue entry for the lot as offered, Bonhams New York, 2023 · Bonhams · 2023on request
  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisNothing likely; the date of the plate is well established in the literature for this composition.

CL-DATEStated by Bonhams, as cataloguerAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Date of printing of this sheet

Unknown

Unknown

The single most consequential unknown about this sheet. Rembrandt's plates continued to be printed long after his death. Until the paper is examined, this record makes no claim about when the impression was pulled.

  • 1Physical observationNo conservator examination has taken place · 2026-08-12

What would change thisIdentification of the paper's watermark against a dated reference; chain-line measurement compared against dated impressions; assessment of plate wear against securely dated impressions in institutional collections.

CL-PRINTING-DATEAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Catalogue reference (Bartsch)

Bartsch 20

Probable
  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisDirect comparison of the composition against the Bartsch entry and against institutional records carrying the same number.

CL-CATREF-BARTSCHAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Catalogue reference (New Hollstein)

New Hollstein 170

Probable

New Hollstein is the current standard catalogue for this material and its numbering is what a print room will expect. Verifying this number is a prerequisite for the census being coherent.

  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisConsultation of the New Hollstein Rembrandt volumes themselves. The project does not currently hold a copy.

CL-CATREF-NHAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Material and technique

Recorded from documentation, not from examination. No conservator has seen the sheet.

Material and technique

Medium

Etching, possibly with drypoint

Possible

The working record says 'etching and drypoint'. Whether drypoint is present on this plate, and whether burr survives in this particular impression, are two different questions — the second is a wear indicator and bears directly on when the sheet was printed.

  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisExamination under magnification for the burr characteristic of drypoint, by a conservator or print specialist.

CL-MEDIUMAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Support

Laid paper

Possible

European paper of this period is overwhelmingly laid, so the claim is unsurprising — but it is currently an assumption, not an observation, and it is recorded at that level.

  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisTransmitted-light examination showing chain and laid lines, which would confirm laid paper and give measurable chain-line spacing.

CL-SUPPORTAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Watermark

Not yet examined

Unknown
  • 1Physical observationNo conservator examination has taken place · 2026-08-12

What would change thisTransmitted-light imaging. A trimmed sheet may carry only a fragment of a watermark, or none at all — a null result here is a real result and will be recorded as one.

CL-WATERMARKAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

State

State

State

Recorded as state III, without signature

Possible

The working record describes this as 'state III of IV'. The number of states recognised for this plate should be taken from the standard catalogue rather than from the acquisition paperwork; see RQ-02. Until that check is done, this record states what the source said and marks it as a report, not a determination.

  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08
  • 5Auction catalogueAuction catalogue entry for the lot as offered, Bonhams New York, 2023 · Bonhams · 2023on request

What would change thisComparison of the diagnostic features of this impression against the state descriptions in the standard catalogue and against dated institutional impressions.

CL-STATEStated by Working record, following the acquisition documentationAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Why this field is harder than it looks

How many states this plate has depends on which catalogue you read. Bartsch, Hollstein and White & Boon each recognise one. The New Hollstein recognises four — and the National Gallery of Art cites that same catalogue as having three. A record reading state III of IV is therefore only intelligible once the catalogue is named.

And state III, the one this sheet is said to be, is not described in any source this project could reach.

The state atlas, with every source

Dimensions

Dimensions

Dimensions

Approximately 137 × 104 mm

Possible

The working record does not say whether this is the plate mark or the sheet. Because the sheet is described as trimmed, the distinction matters: a trimmed sheet can be smaller than the plate. Both measurements will be recorded separately once taken.

  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08

What would change thisRemeasurement under a conservation protocol, recording plate mark and sheet separately, to the millimetre, with the measuring convention stated.

CL-DIMENSIONSAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Inscriptions and marks

Inscriptions and marks

Collector marks and inscriptions

None recorded; verso not yet examined

Unknown

The absence of a record is not a record of absence. Nothing has been examined.

  • 1Physical observationNo conservator examination has taken place · 2026-08-12

What would change thisVerso photography. Collector marks, dealer codes and pencil inscriptions are the most common route into a print's earlier ownership, and they are usually on the back.

CL-MARKSAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Condition

Condition

Condition summary

Trimmed at the left margin; wrinkling and dampstaining at lower left, extending partly into the image; unmounted at purchase

Possible

Condition language from a sale catalogue is written to describe a lot, not to document an object. It is preserved verbatim where possible and will be superseded, not overwritten, when a conservator's report exists.

  • 8Unreviewed submissionOwner's working object record, assembled 2026 · Owner / steward · 2026-08
  • 5Auction catalogueAuction catalogue entry for the lot as offered, Bonhams New York, 2023 · Bonhams · 2023on request

What would change thisA condition report by a paper conservator, which would replace this summary field by field and add severity, extent and stability assessments this record cannot make.

CL-CONDITION-SUMMARYStated by Working record, following the acquisition documentationAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Trimming

Left margin

The sheet is described as roughly trimmed at the left margin. Trimming is irreversible and removes evidence: margins can carry plate marks, inscriptions, dealer codes and collector marks, and their loss narrows what can later be established about the sheet's history.

PossibleNot a conservator's observation

Dampstaining

Lower left

Staining consistent with historic water exposure at the lower left, reported as extending partly into the printed image. Extent, tideline definition and whether the staining is active or stable have not been assessed.

PossibleNot a conservator's observation

Cockling / wrinkling

Lower left

Planar distortion of the sheet in the same area as the staining, which is what one would expect if the two share a cause. Whether the distortion is stable at current relative humidity is unknown.

PossibleNot a conservator's observation

Housing

Whole sheet

Unmounted at purchase. An unmounted sheet is easier to examine and to image, and carries no risk from an old adhesive or an acidic backing board — but it is also less protected in handling and storage, and appropriate archival housing is the first thing a conservator will address.

ProbableOwner's observation, not a conservator's

Not yet assessed

Whole sheet

No assessment exists of foxing, tears, losses, abrasion, thinning, skinning, surface dirt, discolouration, media stability, or the pH of the support. Their absence from this list means nobody has looked, not that they are absent.

UnknownUnattributed

Provenance

Provenance

Current custody

Private collection, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Confirmed

Stated at city level by policy. Storage location, address, security arrangements and insurance values are not published and are not held in this database. See the security and privacy policy.

  • 2Primary documentBonhams invoice and purchase documentation, New York, 2023 · Bonhams · 2023on request

CL-CUSTODYStated by OwnerAdded 2026-08-12Verified 2026-08-12

Ownership before 2023

Unknown

Unknown

Roughly 385 years are unaccounted for between the plate being worked and the 2023 sale. The provenance timeline shows this as an explicit gap rather than beginning the story in 2023.

What would change thisA consignor's name from the auction house, a collector's mark on the verso, an old mount or backing board, a dealer's stock number, or an appearance in an earlier sale catalogue.

CL-EARLIER-PROVENANCEAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Acquisition

Acquisition

Acquisition

Bonhams, New York, 2023

Strongly supported

This is the best-evidenced fact on the page, because it is the only one backed by a primary document the project actually holds.

  • 2Primary documentBonhams invoice and purchase documentation, New York, 2023 · Bonhams · 2023on request

What would change thisNothing — the transaction is documented by invoice. The sale name, date and lot number still need to be transcribed into this record.

CL-ACQUISITIONStated by OwnerAdded 2026-08-12Not independently verified

Rights

Rights

Image rights

No images of this impression are published

Confirmed

The underlying work is in the public domain. Photographs of it do not exist yet. When they do, the licence for each derivative will be stated on the image itself.

CL-RIGHTS-IMAGESStated by ProjectAdded 2026-08-12Verified 2026-08-12

External identifiers

Identifiers for the artist, the composition, the technique and the support, so this record can be joined to others. Each was resolved at the issuing authority; the two marked unverified could not be, and are carried as reported rather than asserted.
SchemeIdentifierRefers toApplies toChecked
ULAN500011051Rembrandt van Rijnartistresolved
WikidataQ5598Rembrandt van Rijnartistresolved
RKDartists66219Rembrandt van Rijnartistresolved
LCNAFn79142935Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, 1606–1669artistresolved
ISNI0000000121363802Rembrandt van Rijnartistunverified
GND11859964XRembrandt van Rijnartistunverified
WikidataQ65024742Self-Portrait in a Velvet Cap with Plumework conceptresolved
AAT300041365etchings (prints) — the object typetechniqueresolved
AAT300053241etching (printing process)techniqueresolved
AAT300053228drypoint (printing process)techniqueresolved
AAT300014184laid papermaterialresolved
AAT300124534self-portraitswork conceptresolved

There is no identifier here for this sheet in any external authority, because none exists. NP-RMB-001 is the identifier this project assigns, and this page is its stable location.

What is unresolved

11 open questions attach to this record. Several need nothing more than a photograph.
  1. RQ-01Does this impression carry the signature “Rembrandt f. 1638”, and if not, why not?low difficulty · suits a student project
  2. RQ-02Which of the four New Hollstein states is this impression, and what distinguishes state III from state IV?medium difficulty · suits a student project
  3. RQ-03What are the plate and sheet dimensions, and does a plate mark survive on any edge?low difficulty
  4. RQ-04Does the sheet carry a watermark, and can it narrow the period in which this impression was printed?high difficulty
  5. RQ-05What is the chain-line spacing, and does it match any impression already recorded in the census?medium difficulty · suits a student project
  6. RQ-06Was this impression printed during Rembrandt's lifetime, or later?high difficulty
  7. RQ-07Does the verso carry collector marks, dealer codes or inscriptions?low difficulty · suits a student project
  8. RQ-09Does any drypoint burr survive in this impression, and what does the plate wear indicate?medium difficulty
  9. RQ-10What caused the dampstaining, and is it stable?medium difficulty
  10. RQ-11Can any owner of this sheet before 2023 be identified?high difficulty
  11. RQ-12Which institutional impressions are the right comparators for assessing wear in this one?medium difficulty · suits a student project

How to read the confidence marks

Every field above carries one. They describe the evidence, not the object's importance.

How confidence is recorded

Confirmed
Established by direct primary evidence that has been examined, with no competing evidence outstanding.
Strongly supported
Supported by more than one independent source of good quality; no source contradicts it.
Probable
Supported by a single good source, or by convergent weaker sources; a competing reading is possible but not currently evidenced.
Possible
Consistent with the available evidence but not demonstrated. Held as a working hypothesis.
Disputed
Competing claims are supported by sources of comparable weight, and the conflict is unresolved.
Rejected
Evidence has been examined and the claim does not hold. Retained so the dead end is not repeated.
Unknown
Not yet investigated, or investigated without result.

Confidence describes the quality of the evidence and nothing else. It is not a measure of how much the project would like a claim to be true, and it cannot be raised without adding a source — the build refuses a claim that outranks the evidence under it.

Elsewhere in the record